Suppressed-Cure Claim Evaluator

Interactive checklist

Score a public cure claim against evidence signals

Enter what the claim says, then score the evidence features. The result is an evidence-literacy verdict, not treatment advice.

Treatment or remedy claim

Exact condition and outcome claimed

Is the claim specific enough to test?

Best human evidence found

Independent replication

Mechanism plausibility at human dose and route

Negative evidence search

Safety and harms reporting

Incentives checked on all sides

Has the claim narrowed as evidence accumulated?

Sales or secrecy pressure

FAQ

Common questions

Can this tell me whether a treatment will work for me?

No. It is an evidence-literacy checklist, not medical advice or a prediction for an individual patient.

Why does the tool score incentives on both sides?

Drug makers, supplement sellers, clinics, influencers, researchers, and media outlets can all benefit from a story. A fair evaluation checks every incentive, not only pharmaceutical incentives.

What evidence would move a claim into a stronger category?

Well-designed human studies, independent replication, meaningful clinical outcomes, transparent harms reporting, and a claim that narrows as evidence accumulates.